Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Cara Shalat Orang yang Tidak Hafal Al-Fatihah




Sumber : Nu.or.id



Personal Injury Lawyer Maryland


Unless you’re a fan of the series—or, like me, you were completely and utterly confused by the Crock Pot ad during Super Bowl LII and decided to dig a little deeper—Jack Pearson’s death probably means close to zilch. The hit NBC series tells the modern-day story of siblings by introducing viewers to their parents through flashbacks. Until the episode following this year’s Super Bowl, viewers knew Jack was deceased, but they were left to speculate about the exact circumstances under which he died.

A slow-cooker with a faulty switch caused a spark that resulted in a fire that quickly engulfed poor Jack’s home. He managed to get his family out of the house to safety, but his decision to go back into the house to heroically save the family dog ultimately proved fatal. Jack made it out of the inferno holding the very-much-alive dog, but cardiac arrest caused by smoke inhalation ultimately ended Jack later at the hospital.

PLAYING THE FAULT GAME
When someone’s death is attributable to anything other than natural causes, the question invariably arises as to who was at fault. Was it a doctor who misdiagnosed an injury or ailment, or was it some conduct or action by the person or another party that caused the death?

Fault is at the center of much of the law in general. Hell, it wasn’t that long ago when obtaining a divorce in the United States required one spouse to prove the other was at fault in causing the marriage to fall apart. Perish the thought two people in a relationship might simply realize being together as a couple was a mistake. According to those antiquated laws, unless your spouse committed adultery, abandoned you, or engaged in other equally unacceptable conduct, you had to remain married.

The finger pointing is alive and well in other areas of the law where proving fault remains essential to one party’s successful outcome. I only practice criminal defense, and I can promise you that fault is a huge aspect of any criminal case. When someone is charged with a crime, the prosecuting agency is damn sure going to try to prove fault or culpability on the part of the defendant. I see the inverse fairly often as well, though, when family members and others enable the defendant by constantly coddling and concocting excuses as to why the conduct “isn’t their fault.”

Load disqus comments

0 comments